Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy 3115-7505 In Press 2027 05 01 Comparative Analysis of the Recoverability and Quantum of Disability Damages in the Legal Systems of Iran and England Comparative Analysis of the Recoverability and Quantum of Disability Damages in the Legal Systems of Iran and England 1 16 EN Journal Article 2026 03 11 <p>Following incidents such as traffic accidents or work-related events, individuals may suffer harm. The damages incurred generally encompass both pecuniary (material) and non-pecuniary (moral) aspects. The recoverability and scope of disability damages are complex issues, and different legal systems have established various rules in this regard. The primary objective of this study is a “comparative analysis of the recoverability and quantum of disability damages in the legal systems of Iran and England.” In terms of purpose, the research is applied; in terms of nature and method, it is descriptive–analytical; and in terms of content, it is qualitative. Given that data were collected from valid scholarly journals, documents, and scientific studies, the research is of a documentary–library type. The findings indicate that the explicit recognition of compensation for disability damages in statutory law strengthens the view that a broad range of pecuniary and non-pecuniary rights is acknowledged within various legal provisions of the Iranian legal system. Unlike the English legal system, Iranian law tends to accept compensation for all forms of damage. The Iranian legal system, influenced by legislative provisions and shaped by customary and religious perspectives, reflects these principles within the structure of laws applied by courts. In contrast, the English legal system, grounded in a more subjective and psychological approach, seeks to compensate disability damages primarily through judicial decisions and doctrinal developments, supplemented by certain statutes, including insurance laws. Based on the findings, the research hypothesis—namely, the existence of differences in the legal implementation of disability damage claims between the legal systems of Iran and England—is confirmed, and the null hypothesis is rejected.</p> https://www.jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/download/294/297