Representation of Modernity in the Works of Iranian Intellectuals from the Qajar to the Pahlavi Era

Authors

    Gholam Alidadi Ph.D. student, Department of Political Sociology, Sho.C., Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran
    Nabiallah Ider * Department of Political Sociology, Sho.C., Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran 5129392736@iau.ir
    Amir Ali Dorosti Department of Political Sociology, Sho.C., Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran

Keywords:

Modernism, Discourse Analysis, Iranian Modernity, Qajar and Pahlavi Intellectuals, Representation of Modernity

Abstract

This study investigates how modernity has been represented in the works of Iranian intellectuals from the Qajar period to the Pahlavi era. Using the method of critical discourse analysis and relying on the examination of textual products—including books, speeches, and newspapers—it seeks to uncover the various discursive logics employed by Iranian intellectuals to understand, critique, or reconstruct modernity. The analysis demonstrates that modernity in Iran has not been perceived as a singular or consensual concept; rather, it has been understood as a polyphonic, multilayered, and diverse phenomenon. Each intellectual, depending on their historical context, social conditions, epistemic resources, and identity-related concerns, has offered a distinct formulation of modernity. The findings indicate that Iranian intellectuals have shaped a wide spectrum of engagements with modernity—ranging from active acceptance to radical critique, and from localization to identity-based reinterpretation. Ultimately, these approaches offer a new perspective on the formation of the discourse of modernity in the history of Iranian thought and show that the experience of modernity in Iran has not been merely imitative, but instead the product of epistemic and identity-based negotiation between tradition, indigenous history, and global narratives of modernity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Eisenstadt SN. Multiple modernities. Daedalus. 2000;129(1):1-29. doi: 10.1177/03058298000290031201.

2. Behnām J. Social Sciences in Iran. Tehran: Tūs Publications; 1996.

3. Delanty G. Formations of European Modernity: Palgrave; 2018.

4. Abrahamian E. Iran between Two Revolutions: Princeton University Press; 1993.

5. Algār H. Mīrzā Malkom Khān. Tehran: Ṭarḥ-e Now Publications; 1990.

6. Mostashār al-Dowleh YK. One Word. Tehran1885.

7. Pāshāzādeh M. Mostashār al-Dowleh and the Reformist Idea. Tehran: Kavīr Publications; 2013.

8. Malekzādeh M. The History of the Iranian Constitutional Revolution. Tehran: Sorūsh; 1984.

9. Maḥmūd M. The History of Relations Between Iran and England. Tehran: Tehran University; 1973.

10. Cronin S. Social Histories of Iran: Modernism and Marginality in the Middle East: Cambridge University Press; 2021.

11. Āl-e Aḥmad J. Westoxication. Tehran: Ravāq / Amīr Kabīr Publications; 1962.

12. Sharī'atī A. Collected Works. Tehran: Ḥoseiniyyeh Ershād; 1971.

13. Sorūsh A. The Theoretical Contraction and Expansion of Sharia and Other Articles. Tehran: Ṣirāṭ; 1991.

14. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization: University of Minnesota Press; 1996.

15. Chakrabarty D. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference: Princeton University Press; 2000.

16. Vakili A. Debating Human Rights in Iran: I.B. Tauris; 1996.

17. Hall S. The West and the Rest. Formations of Modernity: Polity; 1996.

18. Browne EG. A Literary History of Persia. Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Agency; 1959.

19. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity: Polity; 1990.

20. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Polity; 1991.

21. Laclau E. On Populist Reason: Verso; 2005.

22. Laclau E, Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Verso; 1985.

23. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.

24. Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Pantheon; 1977.

25. Durkheim E. The Division of Labor in Society: Free Press; 1893.

26. Fairclough N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research: Routledge; 2003.

27. Phillips L, Jorgensen M. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method: SAGE; 2002.

28. Acaroglu O. The Discursive Turn: The Post-Marxist Gramsci of Laclau and Mouffe. The Discursive Turn: Brill; 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Submitted

2025-05-07

Revised

2025-08-11

Accepted

2025-08-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Alidadi, G. ., Ider, N., & Dorosti, A. A. . (2025). Representation of Modernity in the Works of Iranian Intellectuals from the Qajar to the Pahlavi Era. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-11. https://www.jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/133

Similar Articles

11-20 of 86

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.