A Criminological Analysis of Cryptocurrencies and the Challenges of Prosecuting Blockchain-Based Crimes

Authors

    Akbar Rajabi * Department of Law, Khom.C., Islamic Azad University, Khomein, Iran Akbar.rajabi@iau.ac.ir
    Sajad Rajabi Nezhad Department of Law, Khom.C., Islamic Azad University, Khomein, Iran

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency crime, blockchain forensics, cybercrime, money laundering, decentralized finance, digital evidence, regulatory frameworks, transnational crime

Abstract

The rapid rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology has reshaped global financial systems while simultaneously creating unprecedented opportunities for criminal exploitation. This narrative review examines the criminological dimensions of crypto-crime by analyzing the technological characteristics of decentralized digital assets, offender motivations, behavioural patterns and the systemic challenges faced by law enforcement. The article identifies major typologies of blockchain-enabled crime—including money laundering, fraud, ransomware, darknet transactions, unauthorized mining and exchange breaches—and demonstrates how offenders leverage anonymity, transactional speed and jurisdictional ambiguity to facilitate illicit activity. Through a criminological lens, the review explores how rational decision-making, opportunity structures and transnational collaboration shape offender behaviour in digital environments. The analysis also highlights significant obstacles to detection and prosecution, such as evidentiary limitations, privacy-enhancing technologies, cross-chain obfuscation, inconsistent regulatory frameworks, smart contract complexity and the lack of harmonized global standards. In response to these challenges, the review outlines key policy frameworks and enforcement strategies, including advancements in blockchain forensics, AI-based transaction tracing, AML/CFT regulations, licensing regimes for digital asset service providers, FATF-aligned international standards, cross-border investigative mechanisms and the development of specialized cybercrime units. The review concludes that addressing crypto-crime requires a multidisciplinary, globally coordinated approach that integrates technological innovation, legal reform and enhanced institutional capacity. As blockchain ecosystems continue to evolve, the complexity and scale of digital criminality will increase, making comprehensive, forward-looking strategies essential for effective governance and crime prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Koutsoupia V. Challenges of the Use of Virtual Assets in Money Laundering. Nordic Journal of European Law. 2023;6(4):53-78. doi: 10.36969/njel.v6i4.25919.

2. Mulyana Y. Cybercrime and Transnational Criminal Law: Tackling Online Fraud and Identity Theft. Jurnal Nawala. 2025;2(8):75-85. doi: 10.62872/zep90829.

3. Singh S, Pandey S. The Evolving Cybercrime Landscape in India: Legal Challenges, Digital Evidence, and New Criminal Laws. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 2025;7(2). doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.41627.

4. Krasko MI, Tsevukh A. Evolution of Cybercrime: How Criminal Law Adapting to the Digital Era? Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2025;2(3):387-93. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2025.03.2.63.

5. Mina-Bone SG. Evolución Del Derecho Penal Económico Frente a Los Delitos Financieros Digitales. Revista Científica C&M. 2024;2(3):52-66. doi: 10.55813/gaea/rcym/v2/n3/50.

6. Rusmana IPE, Novelin T. Legal Analysis of Criminal Responsibility for Hackers From the Perspective of Cyber Law in Indonesia. Jihad Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi. 2024;6(4). doi: 10.58258/jihad.v6i4.7676.

7. Atiyah GA, Ibrahim AI, Jasim AA. Enforcement of Smart Contracts in Cross-Jurisdictional Transactions. International Journal of Law and Management. 2024. doi: 10.1108/ijlma-06-2024-0220.

8. Lubis J. The Urgency of Criminal Law Reform to Adapt to the Development of Information Technology. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2025;1(6):287-95. doi: 10.61730/6wxx1c52.

9. Saxena A, Dhaka N. Corporate Criminal Liability: An Indian Perspective. Ijgrit. 2025;03(03):27-40. doi: 10.62823/ijgrit/03.03.7886.

10. Lubis MA, Syaputra MYA. Design of Election Criminal Enforcement Through a Restorative Justice Approach in Nort Sumatra. Jurnal Mercatoria. 2024;17(1):95-107. doi: 10.31289/mercatoria.v17i1.11989.

11. Movchan A, Shliakhovskyi O, Kozii V, Fedchak I. Investigating Cryptocurrency Financing Crimes Terrorism and Armed Aggression. Соціально-Правові Студії. 2023;6(4):123-31. doi: 10.32518/sals4.2023.123.

12. Stepashin VM. The Criminal Code of Mongolia. The General Part. Crime. Law Enforcement Review. 2024;8(3):142-51. doi: 10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(3).142-151.

13. Tarigan EH, Saragih YM. Legal Analysis of Corporate Criminal Liability in Oil and Gas Sector Crimes in Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial Politik Dan Humaniora. 2024;3(3):36-45. doi: 10.55606/jurrish.v3i3.6405.

14. Harefa JE, Rahmayanti R, Siswanto E, Rozy F, Sihite INP. Jurisdictional Enforcement of Cyber Crime Against Lottery Scam. Ijls. 2025;2(3):165-9. doi: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.675.

15. Prabowo D, Saragih YM, Hadi MFA, Emri SI, Sianipar KRD. Implementation of Corporate Criminal Accountability in Indonesian National Economic Crime. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial Politik Dan Humaniora. 2025;4(3):743-8. doi: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5998.

16. Romas IO. Subject of Escape From Places of Detention: Characteristics and Ways to Improve Normative Regulation. Теория И Практика Общественного Развития. 2024(11):264-9. doi: 10.24158/tipor.2024.11.32.

17. Rusman R, Fakrulloh ZA. Reform of Law Enforcement to Strengthen the Legal System in Eradicating Money Laundering Through Cryptocurrency Investments. Journal of Social Research. 2024;4(1):1-15. doi: 10.55324/josr.v4i1.2332.

18. Bentara B, Iskandar I, Setianingrat E, Permana DY, Dikrurahman D. Legal Responsibility for Perpetrators of Online Gambling Crimes. Journal of World Science. 2025;4(5):512-21. doi: 10.58344/jws.v4i5.1408.

19. Baso F, Yusuf DU, Djaoe ANM, Iswandi I, Ramadhany A. Overview of Smart Contract: Legality and Enforceability. Dialogia Iuridica. 2024;16(1):096-111. doi: 10.28932/di.v16i1.10024.

20. Dave E. Smart Contracts and AI: The Legal Landscape of Autonomous Transactions. 2025. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/m2pt4_v1.

21. Tarigan EH, Saragih YM. Corporate Criminal Liability in Oil and Gas Sector Crimes in Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial Politik Dan Humaniora. 2024;3(3):53-62. doi: 10.55606/jurrish.v3i3.6475.

22. Handaruan FDY. Illegal Fishing: Analysis of MV Nika Case in International Criminal Law Perspective. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia. 2024;3(2). doi: 10.15294/ildisea.v3i2.35124.

23. Minggu SH, Dm MY, Pardede R. Law Enforcement Against Palm Oil Theft. Jilpr Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review. 2025;6(3):617-30. doi: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.460.

24. M AY, Hardianto S. The Role of Criminal Law in Combating Corporate Crime That Harms the Public Interest. Global. 2024;2(11):2616-25. doi: 10.59613/global.v2i11.364.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-01

Submitted

2025-02-20

Revised

2025-05-13

Accepted

2025-05-20

How to Cite

Rajabi, A. ., & Rajabi Nezhad, S. (2025). A Criminological Analysis of Cryptocurrencies and the Challenges of Prosecuting Blockchain-Based Crimes. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 3(2), 1-20. https://www.jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/118

Similar Articles

11-20 of 51

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.